The Reader, by Bernhard Schlink is a frank, blunt and disturbing book on many levels. There are many questions raised within the pages, and some relate to issues of morality, ethics, dignity, love and truth. The questions all begin with the narrator, Michel Berg. He is reflecting on his past, one in which he is writing a book about.
The Reader is written in three segments, and each segment has its own chapters. The first one deals with the narrator’s youth and meeting with a woman named Hanna, and their subsequent relationship.
It is 1956 post-war Germany, and he is fifteen years old. He is on his way home, when he becomes ill on the street. He is helped by a woman (he later finds out her name is Hanna) who forcefully takes him to her apartment, washes him, and then firmly walks him home. To hear the narrator tell it, “When rescue came, it was almost an assault. The woman seized my arm and pulled me through the dark entryway into the courtyard.”
From there the plot begins to unravel, and we are led on a journey of discovery, and not necessarily a positive journey. Suffice it to say that a love affair begins between the young teenager, Michael, and a 36-year old woman named Hanna. They develop a routine, ending in his reading to her. As time moves forward, the narrator becomes curious as to Hanna’s background, but she is unwilling to talk about it, and their relationship continues on. That all ends at some point when he finds that she has abruptly left, leaving no trace of herself anywhere.
Michael never gets over the loss of Hanna, and finds it difficult to move forward without his thoughts obsessing on her. He eventually becomes indifferent in order to survive the war going on between his mind and emotions. He wanders through life in an almost robotic state.
Fast forward to 1965, and to the second segment of the book. The narrator is studying Law, and is in a courtroom with other students, studying the drama before them, and writing down, word-for-word, the verbal statements made during the trial. Hanna is one of several SS camp guard defendants on trial. During the trial, Michael realizes that Hanna is withholding information. She could possibly have had her sentence lessened or even dismissed if she admitted the truth about herself. She seemingly would rather be sentenced to prison for her Holocaust actions, than admit her “secret”. The verdict takes several hours to read, and, she is sentenced to prison for her crimes.
Hanna doesn’t want her sense of dignity demeaned, her confident mask she exudes to others diminished, and her self-respect perceived to a lesser degree by others, through the revelation of the truth of her “secret”. Although the reader may find it absurd that one would allow themselves to be convicted and sent to jail for crimes they might otherwise not be found guilty of, Hanna’s self-respect and dignity is tied up in her ability to create a superficial presentation of herself to the world. Dignity, self-respect, shame and degradation are a state of mind and state of Being, within the moral context of the pages of The Reader.
We are now in the early 1980s, and the third segment of the book, and Michael has been married, has a child, and is divorced. He is working as a legal researcher, having been disillusioned during the trial about becoming a lawyer. Through the prison warden he learns that Hanna is being released after eighteen years.
Schlink was born in Gemany in 1944, is a judge and also a professor of law. He is obviously quite knowledgeable, legally speaking, and The Reader left me wondering if any of the story line was in part based on his own experiences.
The book leaves one to ponder several issues. For me, the familial issues were a strong underlying component of the book. For those children who love their parents, family members and friends, what are their resulting and emotional consequences for loving someone who might possibly have been involved in inflicting atrocities on Holocaust victims? There is guilt if you do love them, guilt if you don’t. What are the conclusions that can be drawn from that train of thought? Is there a clear or decisive answer?
Is moral responsibility lessened through the revealing of a series of events in the trial? Is culpability diminished? Hanna eventually takes an initiative regarding her “secret”, and she eventually begins to understand how her power and her actions during the Holocaust affected the lives of others, and she becomes aware of the repercussions and severity of the crime she committed. Her “secret” is a metaphor for the lack of understanding of the depth of the events of the Holocaust, both during and after World War II.
As Michael so aptly put it, “I wanted simultaneously to understand Hanna’s crime and to condemn it. But it was too terrible for that. When I tried to understand it, I had the feeling I was failing to condemn it as it must be condemned. When I condemned it as it must be condemned, there was no room for understanding … I wanted to pose myself both tasks — understanding and condemnation. But it was impossible to do both.”
Bernhard Schlink is concise in his prose, and brings sharpness and clarity to the story line through his brilliant use of imagery, metaphors and messages. There are metaphors relating to moral and ethical responsibility, love, dignity and self-respect. He is masterful in his use of analogy, and his depicting how the human spirit chooses to hide facets of themselves and present a superficial face to the world. The novel is filled with melancholy and depression, and isn’t uplifting in the least. But, in the end, we are faced with truths and issues that must be examined. The Reader is nothing short of a masterpiece.